Mystik610
Member
The 50 is technically a better lens, the 40mm has more of a painterly rendering to it. I chose the TTA 40 mainly on the basis for FOV and size, but it has its quirks especially vs the Viltrox 50. The TTA has this really strong vignetting that doesn't go away when stopping down, and AF pulses at small aperture but works fine wide open. It's an ideal snapshot documentary lens, but probably not a great landscape lens.Carlo, it’s interesting reading your comparison with the Voigtlander 28…I’d like to hear your thoughts on the TTartisans 40 vs the Viltrox 50 Air that you returned from a rendering standpoint (I know you don’t love 50mm focal length). I’ve been quite impressed with the reviews and photos I’ve seen from the Viltrox Air…what did you think of it?
BTW, your Nokton shots are killing me…I really really want onwee now! Geez, the contrast and richness is amazing.
Viltrox 50:
DSC07209 by Mystik, on FlickrTT 40:
DSC07205 by Mystik, on Flickr











