umphotography
POTN Refugee
- Joined
- 28 Nov 2023
- Posts
- 35
- Likes
- 222
- Location
- Idaho falls Idaho
- Name
- Michael L Willett
- Image Editing
- No
I have owned and used most of Canons great primes. 500F/4 ( pretty heavy to hand hold and up close wildlife would often missed ), 300 F/2.8 ( Outstanding glass but 300mm not long enough for wildlife) 400mm F/5.6 ( totally regret selling this lens, almost perfect just a tad short for wildlife) 100-400 ( great glass, sharp pics very handy with 100-300 ability but again a tad short for wildlife needs)
Sigma introduced the 150-600 and the wildlife game was totally changed for so many. I see this lens EVERYWHERE when I am shooting in the national parks. The ability to have a lens to go from 150-600mm and be able to hand hold was a game changer for the industry. Its so good that I dont miss the big canon primes.....600mm is a must for wildlife work and the sigma puts you in the game for under $1000.....My favorite wildlife lens for sure. I can go from a full body shot to a head shot in an instant. Hoping others will show their results with this lens
Sigma introduced the 150-600 and the wildlife game was totally changed for so many. I see this lens EVERYWHERE when I am shooting in the national parks. The ability to have a lens to go from 150-600mm and be able to hand hold was a game changer for the industry. Its so good that I dont miss the big canon primes.....600mm is a must for wildlife work and the sigma puts you in the game for under $1000.....My favorite wildlife lens for sure. I can go from a full body shot to a head shot in an instant. Hoping others will show their results with this lens