Sounds interesting and a pretty compelling FL range for wildlife shooters. Are there any image samples and/or reviews yet?
In my most recent airshow outing, I was shooting the ef100-400ii w/ two 2x TC. I mean if you want to talk about diffraction and degradation of image quality, I can't think of many worse ways to do it.@jwcdds
Cool. I have the RF 100-500mm and it is truly excellent. I does also very well with the RF 1.4xTC for perched birds, but my BIF pics tend to be a bit soft-ish with the extender. Could be me of course. Nevertheless I'm really curious how this lens will do with flying objects.
I got that confused with another lens that had me grasping for air. Yes, this one isn't all that bad cost wise!It's actually a bargain by RF standards!
Makes a lot of sense, Julian.In my most recent airshow outing, I was shooting the ef100-400ii w/ two 2x TC. I mean if you want to talk about diffraction and degradation of image quality, I can't think of many worse ways to do it.
That said, I got away with some pretty decent shots given the frankenstein combo. So I figured starting at 200-800 should give me a great advantage over my existing setup.
Mid December.Makes a lot of sense, Julian.
When will this lens start shipping?
Makes you wonder what else they missed. I think the key ones like dual vs single nano AF motors and optics is accurate as far as I know. Not dealing with a TC has a lot of appeal. Even with 5 stops hand holding an 800mm lens will be tougher. BIF very challenging. That puts me in this area. Can't I just crop that last 100mm?
Indeed and not just from YouTubers but from users.but real life tests is interesting.
We therefore only use essential cookies to make this site work.
Optional cookies are needed to view embedded content - you can turn these cookies on and off as you please.