• Welcome to Focus on Photography Forum!
    Come join the fun, make new friends and get access to hidden forums, resources, galleries and more.
    We encourage you to sign up and join our community.

Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM

Good grief, what an incredibly impressive looking animal.
They are! They were the dominant species on the North American plains until the Europeans arrived and slaughtered them in order to clear the way for settlement. There were something like 30 million of them. After the slaughter there were apparently 116 left. Most of the North American bison in the world today are descended the herd found in this place: Elk Island National Park, just east of Edmonton Alberta, Canada. Now there are something like 1/2 million around the world. There are about 700 bison in the park, from what I've read. They roam freely within the park's boundaries. The fence in the background isn't actually a fence. It looks like the remains of a fence, There are plains Bison north of the highway and Wood Bison south of the highway. They keep them separate. The park is 194 square km. They resettled bison all over the world from here, even in Europe.

You can drive around the park in the hopes of finding bison to photograph. There is a spot where they frequent, and I found a herd there. I took this photo from very close to my car, because they are very large and unpredictable animals. My puny 300mm lens was sufficient! I love this photo because it turned out so well even wide open. I think the 300mm f/4L IS is better than a lot of people say. This photo has some real pop, and it's very sharp.
 
Last edited:
They are! They were the dominant species on the North American plains until the Europeans arrived and slaughtered them in order to clear the way for settlement. There were something like 30 million of them. After the slaughter there were apparently 116 left. Most of the North American bison in the world today are descended the herd found in this place: Elk Island National Park, just east of Edmonton Alberta, Canada. Now there are something like 1/2 million around the world. There are about 700 bison in the park, from what I've read. They roam freely within the park's boundaries. The fence in the background isn't actually a fence. It looks like the remains of a fence, There are plains Bison north of the highway and Wood Bison south of the highway. They keep them separate. The park is 194 square km. They resettled bison all over the world from here, even in Europe.

You can drive around the park in the hopes of finding bison to photograph. There is a spot where they frequent, and I found a herd there. I took this photo from very close to my car, because they are very large and unpredictable animals. My puny 300mm lens was sufficient! I love this photo because it turned out so well even wide open. I think the 300mm f/4L IS is better than a lot of people say. This photo has some real pop, and it's very sharp.
The 300/4 was my most used lens untill I got the Tamron 150-600, since replaced with the RF 100-500.

Still have the 300 however.
 
The 300/4 was my most used lens untill I got the Tamron 150-600, since replaced with the RF 100-500.

Still have the 300 however.
I really like the lens. I could always use more reach, of course, but it's long enough for me, and it's quite sharp too. I also find it a really good size for me. I can easily take it with me when I feel like a walk in the woods. IS makes hand holding a breeze. There's a lot to like about the lens.
 
I really like the lens. I could always use more reach, of course, but it's long enough for me, and it's quite sharp too. I also find it a really good size for me. I can easily take it with me when I feel like a walk in the woods. IS makes hand holding a breeze. There's a lot to like about the lens.

I like the wide open bokeh of the 300/4, not compared it to the 100-500 which is good, but zooms....
 
I can't say enough about this lens but I will try!

It was one of my first L lenses that I purchased 18~19 years ago and has performed flawlessly ever since despite it being my most used lens for a long while. Ironically, I rarely used it bare - I used it with extension tubes almost exclusively to serve as a high quality macro lens with an awesome working distance of about 3 feet and with an extremely narrow field of view. I’d also use it with teleconverters for birding.

I sold it 2 months ago as it just wasn't getting much use ever since I got the EF100-400 II. My EF500 f/4 took over the long focal length duties from the 300mm some time ago.


One of my early shots (2006): EF 300mm f/4L IS on Canon 10D, 1/125s, f/8, ISO 200 with extension tubes
CRW2_7858-2024.jpg

One of last shots taken with the EF 300mm f/4L IS (again with tubes): on Canon R5, 1/125s, f/5.6, ISO 800
R502_0657-2024.jpg

So don’t be afraid to pick one up if you find a great copy.
 
Last edited:
You really got some amazing macro shots with the 300/4L!
Thank you, Levina.

Using the 300mm for macro was great "back in the day" as there weren't as many options back then. Most current lenses can focus much closer (even zooms) than what was possible before which necessitated me using the tubes.

I still prefer to use longer focal lengths for macro while out in the field. It disturbs the subjects less and allows me to isolate the background.

EF 300mm f/4L IS on Canon 30D: 1/250s, f/11, ISO 400 with extension tubes
30D3_1451-2024.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom