KD_Reno
Gold Member
Binoculars are like any other optics. You get what you pay for, but you'll pay a lot more to get a little bit more.
The Nikon Monarch range are good values. Vortex offers good value as well, with several price points.
I have a pair of Zeiss Victory SF in 8x42. More than you want to spend, but I'm a birder with a camera, so observation is important to me. And I use them almost every day, even it's just walking the dog around the neighborhood. I preferred the feel and handling of them over comparable Swaros and Leicas. Their SFL line is a bit less, but still probably too high. But if weight is a big consideration they are a top choice. The 40mm models weigh about the same as other 32s. I got a pair for my wife (10x40) and she loves them.
8 vs 10 is a very subjective choice. I can often make out a distant bird easier with my 8 than my wife's 10, just because of the steadier image. And it's easier to find and follow birds in foliage at closer distances with 8x. But if you're mainly interested in getting a quick id at longer distance you'll probably prefer a 10x.
Choosing a 32 vs 40/42 objective comes down to weight vs brightness. At dawn or dusk the difference in brightness will be noticeable, but during the day not so much. If they're going to be in bag most of the time you might prefer the lower weight. Also note that brightness is affected by lens material and coatings, and 32s will cost a bit less than42s in any give model.
Finally, if budget is a top consideration do not look at anything more expensive while you're in the shop
.
The Nikon Monarch range are good values. Vortex offers good value as well, with several price points.
I have a pair of Zeiss Victory SF in 8x42. More than you want to spend, but I'm a birder with a camera, so observation is important to me. And I use them almost every day, even it's just walking the dog around the neighborhood. I preferred the feel and handling of them over comparable Swaros and Leicas. Their SFL line is a bit less, but still probably too high. But if weight is a big consideration they are a top choice. The 40mm models weigh about the same as other 32s. I got a pair for my wife (10x40) and she loves them.
8 vs 10 is a very subjective choice. I can often make out a distant bird easier with my 8 than my wife's 10, just because of the steadier image. And it's easier to find and follow birds in foliage at closer distances with 8x. But if you're mainly interested in getting a quick id at longer distance you'll probably prefer a 10x.
Choosing a 32 vs 40/42 objective comes down to weight vs brightness. At dawn or dusk the difference in brightness will be noticeable, but during the day not so much. If they're going to be in bag most of the time you might prefer the lower weight. Also note that brightness is affected by lens material and coatings, and 32s will cost a bit less than42s in any give model.
Finally, if budget is a top consideration do not look at anything more expensive while you're in the shop
